Notts County were not forced to sell Lee Hughes for financial reasons
NOTTS County were not forced to let big-earner Lee Hughes go because of their cash problems, insists boss Keith Curle.
Striker Hughes, 36, left Meadow Lane for Port Vale just 24 hours before chairman Ray Trew revealed the club is having to make cuts to claw back a £70,000 overspend on wages or risk sanctions from the Football League.
-
Lee Hughes
But Curle says the two are not connected – and that Hughes wanted to go because he will earn a deal for next season if he fires Vale to promotion into League One, while the Magpies were not going to offer him a new contract at the end of this season.
Hughes scored on his debut for the Valiants on Saturday as Notts' league game at Portsmouth was called off two hours before kick-off because of a waterlogged pitch.
Cheap Van Insurance(Commercial & Private Use) - Contact Insure365...
View detailsCheap Van Insurance(Commercial & Private Use) - Contact Insure365 01782 898188, Free Legal Expenses Cover Included at £25.00!
Terms: 1 Voucher Per Customer
Contact: 01782 898188
Valid until: Monday, June 24 2013
"Lee came to see me and told me what Port Vale had offered him and he said it was the right time for him to move because he has the opportunity to play more games and get another year's contract," said Curle.
"He said he wanted to leave and he went with our best wishes because he has been a fantastic servant to the club.
"When a player makes their mind up they want to go you have got to let them go.
"It's very difficult to sit there and say 'no' you've got to stay.
"If it had been a 24-year-old striker that was scoring a lot of goals, it would have been different, but Lee's 36.
"It was not a financial situation. It was purely based on Lee wanting to make a career move."
Hughes' exit has left Notts with just two strikers, in Yoann Arquin and Enoch Showunmi, until Curle can bolster his frontline.
And he says Showunmi is eager to be given a chance, having only started one league game all season.
"Enoch is chomping at the bit to get this chance and he's got ability – he's just got to bring it all together and show it," he said.
Comments
by 19Smiffy30
Monday, January 14 2013, 10:56PM
“To the faceless people who down rated my original post I can only say....check out the reliable reports on the match....it was an own goal with Lee doing his usual thing of claiming that he got a 'touch'......he used to do it when he played for us....sometimes he got away with it,other times he did not.
I did not agree with Keith giving the number nine to anyone else before Lee left the club,it was stupid and caused a lot of resentment with the club's supporters.
Finally,I hope Lee goes on to score goals for his new club and is happy....long may the old man play.;-)...and...Thank you Lee.!
appeal to the Gods....'Please,Please send us another striker of his Quality { when he was at his best...(30+ goals per year.) }”
by GAFFA
Monday, January 14 2013, 6:47PM
“KC Showed what he thought of lee hughes when he gave his number 9 shirt away to a no hoper. long may you play lee coyp”
by 19Smiffy30
Monday, January 14 2013, 2:38PM
“Hughes did not score,it was an own goal.”