'The council misled us', claim swim bath campaigners
CAMPAIGNERS trying to save the Victoria Leisure Centre claim they have been misled by the city council.
The council said it would take £1.3m just to complete basic maintenance of the Sneinton swimming baths, and wants to build a new facility.
But the Save the Victoria Baths group say the existing building's 'condition survey' shows £1.3m would go much further than the council states, and that the baths could be totally refurbished for £2m.
The council used the condition survey to make its cost assessment.
Mat Anderson, the Save the Victoria Baths spokesman, said: "The condition survey was presented (by the council) as saying £1.3m was needed for basic and essential maintenance. But this is clearly not the case, it goes well beyond that.
"Our research shows the main push from the community is to keep the existing building but bring it up to a modern standard.
"The condition survey shows that this could be done within a £2m budget."
Any new facility would be built nearby as part of a major redevelopment of Sneinton Market.
Mr Anderson has accused the council of misleading the public, and said he wants to know why councillors did not look closely at the information they were being fed.
"Why does the council persist in the belief that the refurbishment of the leisure centre is too expensive and unpopular, when the financial facts say otherwise?" he said.
"In survey after survey, people say they want to keep the Victoria Leisure Centre."
The group is urging people in St Ann's and Sneinton to lobby council leader Jon Collins for answers.
Coun David Trimble, city council portfolio holder for communities, leisure and culture, said: "From the very beginning my view and vision has been that we try to provide a first-class facility. What is there at the moment, even with refurbishment, will not be good enough. I want a facility that will attract young people – that means a new facility."
The city council's Executive Board proposed in February to close the leisure centre.
At its March meeting it backed down and committed to refurbishing the facility or building a new one.
But Coun Trimble told the Evening Post: "As far as I am concerned the change of decision we made was to provide a new facility."
charles.walker@nottinghameveningpost.co.uk














7 Comments
View all
by Anna, sheffield/uni, not work!
Tuesday, December 09 2008, 12:20PM
“Yes Meeki, Check whyte industries waiting round the corner seeing if we dont notice them close down our local baths....dont think so some how. Get nottingham fit, keep nottingham fit, how? Not by taking forever to sort it out....c'mon NCC!!”
by Zoziebelle, In soon to be leisureless NG2
Monday, December 08 2008, 4:05PM
“The issue to my mind, along with wishing the existing site to be revamped and with improved facilities, but the wait that it will take for the council, who to my knowledge have not earmarked a site as yet let alone begun construction on said possible site. It is a right as council tax payers to have local, easily accessible, affordable facilities. Now not in a couple of years time!”
by Meeki, Nottingham
Monday, December 08 2008, 2:00PM
“Never believe a councillor especially when there's a preferred partner waiting in the shadows to redevelop the whole site.
IIs one councillor's opinion more important than those protecting Sneinton's heritage?”
by Fletch, Notts
Monday, December 08 2008, 1:20PM
“The council want to build a whole new facility. Get into this century and let them do it! It will no doubt be a modern centre and 1 i would certainly use over victoria as it is now.”
by Mel, Nottingham
Monday, December 08 2008, 12:40PM
“Nobody's really surprised at this outcome, are they?”