University worker Yezza jailed for nine months
A UNIVERSITY of Nottingham administrator who falsely claimed he was allowed to be in Britain has been jailed for nine months.
Hicham Yezza was originally arrested under the Terrorism Act after he printed off a copy of an al Qaida manual for a friend. Both were later released without charge.
-

Hicham Yezza
Yezza, 31, of Barker Gate, Nottingham, was then arrested again after police found his passport which he claimed had been stolen – and revealed he was an Algerian national.
Northampton Crown Court heard that Yezza had failed to get his documents stamped since 2003 and that his stay in the UK was illegal.
He claimed immigration officials extended his stay until December 2007.
Last month he was found guilty of securing avoidance of enforcement action by deceptive means.
In mitigation, Caroline Bradley, said her client had demonstrated a certain amount of "stupidity" because it was likely he would have had his stay in the UK extended if he had applied to have his visa renewed in 2003.
She said: "He did not in any way try to hide his identity and, if he had done things properly, he would have been granted in all likelihood the right to stay in this country."
Sentencing him, Judge Charles Wide QC told him: "I find that your guilt in this case involved the deliberate, extended manipulation of the system for immigration control, which involved deliberate and serious deceit.
"The public is entitled to have confidence in the system of immigration control but it makes it much more difficult for truthful applicants if some applicants tell lies, as you did."







16 Comments
View all
by Disillusioned, UK
Tuesday, March 10 2009, 9:31PM
“Time this person was DEPORTED with immediate effect.”
by Jock, Notts
Tuesday, March 10 2009, 2:15AM
“Please try reading the story instead of trying your spin as he was only here legally till 2003. He CLAIMED his visa was stamped until 2007 but could not find it and immigration had no records of it being stamped till 2007. He is caught out as a liar and a cheat and people like you still try to defend him.”
by Jeff, Beeston
Sunday, March 08 2009, 8:47PM
“In 2007 he would have been here over 10 years, making him eligible for permanent citizenship in the UK. Perfectly lawful. Nothing illegal there, Jock.”
by Jock, Notts
Sunday, March 08 2009, 2:44PM
“Milan, it is nothing to do with anti immigration comments its all to do with illegal immigrants coming to the country and thinking they can break our laws at any time. If he was so innocent then please explain his lies and attempted deceipt of the legal system.
If he was not guilty he would have been found not guilty ans he would have a stamped visa to prove it. Even if his claim was true this would only take him up to 2007 so why was he still here after then, because he is illegal.
So according to you his prosecution is a smear campaign NO its another ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT caught lying and trying to cheat the system.”
by Lesta, Lace Market
Sunday, March 08 2009, 8:08AM
“Jail for an offence which wasn't drug, violence, theft or sex related does seem over the top. He should certainly be deported as he has been here illegally for a number of years and has no right to remain here when released. He should have kept his gob shut and his finger off the "Print" button as he'd have been here for decades to come as the incompetents in the immigration service would never have found him.
Will the university be proscecuted for employing an illegal ?”
by Milan Rai, Hastings
Sunday, March 08 2009, 7:00AM
“Hicham Yezza came to public attention because the authorities locked him up and tried to deport him last year for handling a publicly-available document downloaded from a US Government website. He was cast as a terrorist, despite the fact that he has an honourable record of peace activism in this country, and was only printing the al-Qaeda-related document for a colleague doing research into terrorism - as a tutor soon testified. An international outcry stopped Hicham's deportation and ended his detention. The current prosecution has been part of an embarassed attempt by the authorities to smear Hicham and to make people forget what they did to him last year. The prison sentence is completely disproportionate, and I look forward to seeing more of the facts come out on appeal - which I am sure Hicham will win. Unfortunately, the anti-immigrant comments on this thread just show how badly we need people like Hicham to help Britain develop.”
by Andyman, Derbys
Sunday, March 08 2009, 2:57AM
“The supporters are out banging their drums, but i find posting as "The Truth" quite amusing, particularly as you try to portray a convicted criminal as innocent.
TRUTH-he claimed his passport was stolen, but was it not found at another postal address. not his place of residence.
TRUTH-he claimed his visa was stamped until 2007 when in fact it was not, so where was his stamped visa. Surely such an important document which would prove him here legally would be kept safely, and easily accessible.
TRUTH-he was found guilty securing avoidance of enforcement action by a court of law, so they weighed up the substantial evidence and got it worng did they.
Perhaps its beyond your comprehension to see that his race, colour, religion, or nationality is irrelevant, he is here illegally and has tried every common trick to stay.
But perhaps people like you deliberately attempt to interject race into debate to massage and manipulate it round to a racial issue, irrespective of the real facts.”
by The Truth, Nottingham
Sunday, March 08 2009, 2:34AM
“Funny how people are so prepare to judge the personality of someone they don't know, and the justice of a trial they have not heard the transcript of. Is it because the magical word "immigrant" or "foreigner" or "Muslim" makes you instantly not see a human being in your eyes but merely an object to be shunned?
I hope that you never have to face a Kafkaesque nightmare like Mr Yezza's.
As for Andyman, what the hell are you waffling on about DNA and suchlike, you clearly have zero understanding of what happened, the charge or what the verdict means and that, in fact, despite you assertions, there is insufficent evidence to deport Mr Yezza, thus confirming what his supporters have maintained all along, that they had no right to deport him...”
by marian, Notts
Saturday, March 07 2009, 11:58PM
“Hmmmm...”
by John, Carlton
Saturday, March 07 2009, 10:28PM
“I think we all know who the imbeciles are George. All those idiot supporters who beleived his lies and thought he was some sort of mesianic being when really he was just a lying, trouble maker of no use to anyone.”