Nottingham City Council signs up to fight 'bedroom tax'
IN an attempt to fight the Government's housing benefit cut – dubbed the "bedroom tax" – Nottingham City Council has started a petition calling on the policy to be scrapped.
One week after it was launched, more than 750 people have already signed.
-

Concerns: Graham Allen MP, centre, signs the petition with councillors. From left, Mohammed Saghir, Dave Trimble, Michael Edwards and Malcolm Wood
Nottingham North MP Graham Allen said he expected many more would sign up once they were aware of the impact of the changes.
He added: "The letters informing people are starting to drop on to doormats and I imagine thousands will be wanting to sign the petition.
Cheap Van Insurance For 17,18 & 19 Year Old Drivers - Call Insure365 01782 898188, Free Legal Expenses Cover Included Valued at £25.00!
Terms: 1 Voucher Per Customer
Contact: 01782 898188
Valid until: Saturday, June 22 2013
"The Government should listen to the council and the housing associations, housing charities and organisations including the National Housing Federation, who have all expressed serious concerns about these changes.
"The Government is punishing vulnerable people for housing choices over which they have little control and forcing them into temporary accommodation that will not provide the stability and security households need."
The Meadows councillor Michael Edwards said: "We're trying to get people the support they need before the changes come in, but this is a damaging policy for the vulnerable and disabled people and we need to fight it."
If tenants are believed to be "under-occupying" their property by one room, the amount of rent eligible for housing benefit will be cut by 14 per cent.
If they have two or more spare rooms, it will be cut by a quarter.
The Government has given the city council money to alleviate the impact of this scheme – £274,000 this year and £696,000 next year – but the authority has said is not enough to help all affected households and may not continue beyond next year.
The scheme is concerning residents like Kate Davies, 48, who has lived in her two-bedroom house in Lenton for two decades but says she may have to move somewhere smaller.
She lives on her own but her son Benjamin Davies-Harrison, 27, who is in the RAF, stays in the spare room for long periods.
Kate said: "If I move to a one-bedroom home he'll have to sleep on the floor.
"He's away in America at the moment and stays at the barracks when he's back.
"But he gets long breaks and comes home."
Kate, a full-time carer for her aunt, who lives nearby, fears having to move away from the area.
She said: "It's worrying. With the bedroom tax I can't afford to stay where I am."




16 Comments
View all
by GAZ_UK
Tuesday, March 05 2013, 8:01PM
“Well i see my comment did get on here,bit like the news on tv blocking the truth”
by Vox_Populii
Monday, March 04 2013, 11:24PM
“More social cleansing from the beloved Coalition, ably assisted by the blue-rinse apologists who are sitting pretty and asset-rich.”
by BLawrenson
Monday, March 04 2013, 8:24PM
“For those left wondering the censored word was e q u i t a b l e . Hope I get it through this time.”
by BLawrenson
Monday, March 04 2013, 8:21PM
“I fear that this is yet another ill thought out scheme. What is needed is a brand new workable and ******ble benefit system that gets rid of the complicated rules that have evolved over the years since 1948. What worries me is that it is beyond the abilities of the present politicians of any party to do this.”
by GoldenPsych
Monday, March 04 2013, 7:30PM
“This is worth a read...
http://tinyurl.com/cdcczkg”
by Dave_Nottm
Monday, March 04 2013, 6:27PM
“Nice to know that our supposedly cash-strapped Council can still find the money to organise another purely political gesture.”
by SteveBasford
Monday, March 04 2013, 6:26PM
“SB, I believe the policy, for now at least, applies solely to social tenants, but I'm no expert. At any rate, the tenant, be it private or not, is receiving the benefit of that money in the form of a roof, so I think it's just a moot point anyway.”
by smshogun
Monday, March 04 2013, 6:24PM
“One problem has not been highlighted and this is when all the three bedroom houses have been freed up it will mean that there will be a shortage of single and two bedroom properties as demand will be so high, so what then. Are people going to be made homeless and if so who will be left to deal with it.”
by Anna1964
Monday, March 04 2013, 6:09PM
“If the government don't back down then everyone needs to refuse to pay this disguting bedroom tax. It would cost too much to take everybody to court or for the council and housing associations to evict every tenant for non payment. The people affected have to stick together then maybe we can get rid of what is an appalling tax, it may be the only way we can win this disgraceful government.”
by irvine
Monday, March 04 2013, 4:41PM
“SB
That isn't correct. The under occupancy rules apply to social housing only.”