Revamp of St Ann's is on track
THE regeneration of part of St Ann's has moved a step closer to completion.
Plans to build 111 new homes at the Stonebridge Park Estate, off Carlton Road, were approved this week.
-

Stonebridge Park houses
And cash for the makeover of the Rocket Park play area on the estate has also been promised.
The latest plans are a continuation of the regeneration of Stonebridge Park, which began in 2009, with several parts of the estate already built.
Book a table at Tonights STEAK NIGHT and get a FREE DRINK*
Spaghetti Amore At The Old Volunteer
View detailsCome and join us tonight for Steak night and get a free pint or glass of house wine
Terms:
*selected drinks ONLY
Redeem voucher for free drink or quote thisisnottingham when ordering
Contact: 0115 896 2165
Valid until: Tuesday, May 21 2013
Building firm Keepmoat was given £620,000 from the Government's Get Britain Building fund and is working in partnership with the city council on the development.
Resident Richard Pearson, 55, of Belle Vue Court, had been writing to government ministers asking for money to be spent in the area.
He said: "We're quite pleased with the whole development.
"It's going to be a really good thing for St Ann's. It should make the area brilliant and a nice place to live."
The application for 111 new homes constitutes phases 3 and 6 of the regeneration project and relates to the eastern and central areas of the Stonebridge Estate.
City councillors have also pledged £11,000 toward the redevelopment of Rocket Park – a play area which sits in the heart of the estate.
Barry Crofts of Eastham Close, has been living on the estate for 32 years.
The 61-year-old said: "It's all being done well. It's good news. I walk my dog in Rocket Park and that will look a lot better."
The development of the estate involves 258 new homes and the upgrading of 243 existing houses.
Councillor Dave Liversidge said he was pleased the latest plans had been passed. "We're going quicker than I ever imagined in the area," he said.
"We need to get that park working for local residents.
"I think it's going to be an attractive area whether for council tenants or people in a bought house."
The new houses will be made up of 31 two-bedroom-houses and 81 three-bedroom-houses. Eight of the houses are due to be low-cost housing units, with the rest of them for sale as private homes.
Shaun Fielding, regional head of land and partnerships at Keepmoat, said: "It's a privilege for Keepmoat to work with Nottingham City Council and residents to continue the redevelopment of the Stonebridge Park area of St Ann's.
"The site will offer buyers the opportunity to own a home on the doorstep of the city centre, but for a fraction of the cost of a city-centre flat."




7 Comments
by Marcus_Down
Tuesday, March 26 2013, 4:29PM
“As my last post was deleted I'll try again. Guess who is a councilor for this ward?? Our dear leader.
Hoping to keep his position?”
by Treetop99
Saturday, March 23 2013, 5:08PM
“"Perhaps if we stopped spending money on St Ann's decade after decade there wouldn't be a charge for a spare bedroom.
I worked on the revamp of the 90's and that's was soon run down by the majority of the locals, and why, because when its broke, the tax payers will pay to fix it.
You can only attempt to polish a t... for so long before you must realise it won't shine."”
by Treetop99
Saturday, March 23 2013, 5:05PM
“Perhaps if we stopped spending money on St Ann's decade after decade there wouldn't be a charge for a spare bedroom.
I worked on the revamp of the 90's and that's was soon run down by the majority of the locals, and why, because when its broke, the tax payers willowy to fix it.
You can only attempt to polish a t... for so long before you must realise it won't shine.”
by choirbod
Saturday, March 23 2013, 2:48PM
“I'm not affected by the Bedroom Tax, but the thing that gets me is that I'm one of the lucky ones purely by chance.
I've always had low-waged work, but because my kid's dad (who's no longer with us) moved here from London before house prices here shot through the roof, we were able to buy a house and pay off the mortgage fairly quickly. He was made redundant shortly after our second child was born and after that only managed to get short-term work. It was a real struggle, but at least we had a relatively secure home. That means my children will still have a home to come back to while they're at university, they'll still have somewhere to come back to if they're unlucky enough not to get a reasonable job, or indeed one at all, after they finish their degrees in Maths and Physics.
I'm lucky not to have developed a debilitating illness; I'm lucky not to have had a serious accident.
None of this makes me more deserving than the people who're being hit by this tax. Many of them will have paid as much in rent as I did for the mortgage. My children and I are only in this lucky position because of timing, because of sheer chance. That can't be fair.
What would be fair would be for everyone to be treated with a bit of respect, with some dignity. That wouldn't be too difficult with the political will. It was done before, after WW2. We could do it again if we wanted to.”
by choirbod
Saturday, March 23 2013, 1:16PM
“Ah, so people STILL have no understanding about how the bedroom is going to badly affect people who NEED the "spare" room.
The list is endless, but here are a few examples:
People with disabilities that cause sleep problems -couple need separate rooms to sleep in to get adequate rest, especially important for the carer;
Families with an autistic child who barely sleeps and so would badly disrupt the sleep of a sibling;
People who've had their homes specially adapted;
People who have young children who are told their children have to share a room but who, in a year or so's time, will have to move again when their children are older and are no longer legally supposed to share;
People who'd like to have grandchildren to stay etc, etc;
All being penalised.
"why should others, often on modest means, pay for someone elses spare bedroom when in all probability they havent got a spare bedroom themselves." ?
- If you feel that, why don't you mind having to pay MORE for someone else's accommodation as rents in the private sector are invariably MORE for a one-bedroom property, mainly due to profiteering landlords?”
by EggyEggCup
Saturday, March 23 2013, 12:40PM
“There's plenty of one bedroom flats in the private sector. If they don't want to contribute towards their extra unsused bedrooms they can move out into a smaller property and then their rent will be fully paid for. Seems fair to me, why should others, often on modest means, pay for someone elses spare bedroom when in all probability they havent got a spare bedroom themselves. I haven't got a spare bedroom, would you like to send money to me so I can move into a bigger house and have one.”
by choirbod
Saturday, March 23 2013, 11:06AM
“So, no one-bedroom-houses for all these people being penalised by the Bedroom Tax!”