THE city has every right to savour its success in winning a place in England's bid for the 2018 World Cup.

But in other parts of the region Nottingham's victory looked unlikely.

It is easy to see why.

The submission was based on a new stadium which is not built and does not have planning permission, and given its proposed location in the green belt east of Gamston, split the bid team.

However, the Football Association was aware of those limitations and still chose Nottingham.

The FA was persuaded the stadium could be delivered.

And those putting together the nation's bid to the sport's world governing body, FIFA, were wowed by the ideas for celebrating the World Cup here, the legacy it could leave and the iconic associations with Brian Clough and Robin Hood.

Now the FA has made its decision, it is time to consolidate regionally and locally.

This will require partnership but at times also compromise, on all sides.

Leicester and Derby are disappointed, but the full potential of hosting the World Cup will only be realised with both those cities, and their counties, participating.

Closer to home, the city and county councils must find some common ground. They are making the right noises but hard evidence of a shared commitment is required.

Even if they can't agree on the new stadium, they can work together to deliver the best package. It means Rushcliffe Borough Council must give the proposals for the new stadium, which come with a large residential development, thorough consideration.

Is there any reason why the borough should not include the proposition in the first draft of its long-term plan?

That would allow residents to see for themselves what is proposed.