“I'm, like, really stupid.”

“Actually, 'MadBadger' is beyond the pale even for his fellow self-hating racists in ZaNuLabour. It's why he posts on here a lot, and why he keeps posting under MY name. He won't use his real name. I wonder why, ----?

Luckily, the sad Labour Party activist 'MadBadger' (the fake one that is) and his extreme left views have no effect on votes in the real world.

Only sad lonely, little racists use the word 'Pwned'.”

“Again we seem to think that we are talking about the dark ages.
The parent had rights but in most cases they chose to take the attitude that the Authorities knew best and it meant that in such cases the parent was relieved of the responsibility of the upbringing of the child.
No doubt the parent believed it was in the best interest of the child.
If children were told their parent was dead then again it would have been done in the interest of the child.
At this distance it does seem harsh and possibly wrong but again I ask how many of the children benefited in the long term?
Many would have suffered abuse here in Britain possibly at the hands of their parents or guardians.
This in no way excuses any of the harm done to individual children.
But an excuse at this point in time means nothing.
But again, if individual children feel better for an excuse then individuals should be reached out to and as long as they can believe it is some kind of reparation then it may lay a ghost or two.”

“I do not think it was quite that simple in those days Mr Sensible.
We are only quibbling because as in adoption throughout history there is abuse in some cases.
Sadly this happens in cases of fully legal adoptions too.”

“Doc, the difference is that in order for an adoption to take place, a legal process has to be gone through, which has the full knollege of the parents.

Whereas in this case the parents were told their child had been adopted and taken elsewhere, and the children were told their parents were dead.

"Where in heaven's name did the parent think the child had gone?
And were they at all concerned at the time?"

I am sure they were concerned at the time; as I say in order for full adoption a full legal process has to be gone through.”

“Mr Sensible . . .
Just what is the difference between a child being 'forced' from its parents and given to an adoptive parent in Britain to one 'forced' from its parents and adopted in Australia?
Either way the parents, or simply parent, did not demur.
Where in heaven's name did the parent think the child had gone?
And were they at all concerned at the time?
I may sound hard but surely these are the questions we should be asking and these facts should be part of the story as told today.”

“I have been busy today so this is a late posting.
I have read the almost hysterical posting based on BBC News reports and am even more convinced that there is some sinister political motive behind this hypocritical apology that the Australian Government seem to want to comply with if only to put it to bed as quickly as possible.This material, if it had been any other than a Commonwealth White dominated and ruled Nation have been deemed Racist due to the slanderous tone of its accusations against the citizens of Australia.
It appears to condemn those who took these abandoned children in as evil abusers and slave drivers of the worst kind.
Why in heavens name were these parents in the '50s and '60s who purportedly had their children wrested from them and subsequently lost forever not up in arms at the time?
We are not talking about the 19th century here but a few short years ago.
Millions are still alive who knew nothing about this at the time.
Or if they did were of the opinion that it was a good action on the part of the authorities.
Just what was the future in Britain for these abandoned children?”

“Sad strikes again.”

“Sorry, ¿Sad Socialist Badger¿, got to get back to the real world.”

“'Ted', has there been a survey done?

Can you publish the findings?

I'm, like, really interested.”