Long Eaton man banned for drink-driving in West Bridgford

Trusted article source icon
Thursday, March 07, 2013
Profile image for rsherdley

rsherdley

A DRINK driver has been banned from the roads for four years after he was three times the limit.

Anthony Ball, 34, of Petersgate Close, Long Eaton, had too much to drink to legally drive a Ford Mondeo on the A52 in West Bridgford on February 2 this year.

  1. Scales of Justice

Magistrates in Nottingham heard he had 106 micrograms of alcohol in 100 millilitres of breath, when the legal limit is 35.

He entered a guilty plea to drink-driving and received the four-year driving disqualification.

Landlords - Let Only £195

Zoom Lettings

View details

Print voucher

Landlords let us advertise your property and find you vetted tenants quickly. Our let only service is £195.
We offer full management services as well as rent guarantee and rent advance. Call us

Terms: No hidden charges, you will be informed of all costs in advance. The letting agency you can trust.

Contact: 0115 8969582

Valid until: Sunday, June 30 2013

A community order was also imposed, with a 16-week curfew, starting on February 28. He has to remain at his home address between 7pm and 7am. 

A further requirement was imposed to attend appointents with the Probation Service for 12 months.

He has to pay a £60 victim surcharge and costs of £85.

5
Tweet this article
Report

5 Comments

  • Profile image for HueyTheNoose

    by HueyTheNoose

    Friday, March 08 2013, 7:34AM

    “Four year ban for drink driving? No doubt this was his second or third offence of the same type. No one gets a four year ban for one offence of drink driving.The laughable thing is, if he carries on drink driving, they will no doubt give him another couple of years 'ban'. It's a joke.”

  • Profile image for painter39

    by painter39

    Thursday, March 07 2013, 9:04PM

    “Get on line and look where the 'surcharge is goingand ask yourself what the hell is that got to do with the motorist?”

  • Profile image for painter39

    by painter39

    Thursday, March 07 2013, 8:28PM

    “Doesn't explain what a 'victim surcharge' is”

  • Profile image for victormildew5

    by victormildew5

    Thursday, March 07 2013, 7:07PM

    “the taxpayer who has paid for this moron to be apprehended and dealt with is the victim as they pay for the police,courts,probation...etc...its hardly rocket science and by no means stealth.”

  • Profile image for painter39

    by painter39

    Thursday, March 07 2013, 6:02PM

    “Victim surcharge ? What victim? Did someone get injured?
    Or just another stealth tax for the plod?”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article