Jobs set for axe at City Council
HUNDREDS of city council staff will be told today their jobs are at risk.
Nottingham City Council is cutting staff in order to save money.
-

Coun Graham Chapman
The authority is seeking to save about £18m in the next financial year to fund additional costs such as the increase in child protection cases, extra expenditure on adult social care, the council's move to a new office and paying money back to reserves which have fallen too low.
The council has refused to say how many jobs will go because it does not want to "panic" staff.
It released a statement last night saying 166 more jobs will be lost than will be created in the shake-up at the council.
Coun Graham Chapman, deputy leader of the city council, said: "Council officers feel if we were to say this is the gross number of job losses, staff would get panicky unnecessarily."
In its statement, the city council said: "It is unlikely that our budget proposals can go ahead without reductions in our workforce, though councillors and officers have worked hard to keep these to a minimum and protect front line services.
"The Executive Board has recommended a budget which, allowing for posts deleted and posts created, results in a reduction in the council's workforce of 166 full-time equivalent posts."
Staff will be told today if they are affected and will be invited to one-to-one briefings. There will be a 90-day consultation period with staff and unions.
Coun Jon Collins, leader of the city council, said: "We are looking to provide the same level of services but in a more cost-effective way. This has meant reorganising the council leading to a small reduction in posts.
Ravi Subramanian, regional officer at Unison, said: "It's a blow for Nottingham and the wider conurbation. We have got job losses at the county council and the city council. It will have an impact on individuals but also on the local economy."
Last year, the city council announced almost 700 jobs could go, with half of them vacant positions and half filled posts.
In the end, 241 vacant posts were deleted, 210 staff took voluntary redundancy, and 20 compulsory redundancy.
Yesterday, the Executive Board of the city council agreed its budget proposals.
But the budget still has to be approved by a meeting of the full council in March.







7 Comments
by Meeki, Notingham
Thursday, February 25 2010, 7:24PM
“Labour should have deselected Graham Chapman over the Raleigh v Blenheim allotments fiasco.
Council management have little to be proud off.”
by Mr. Sensible, The Real World
Thursday, February 25 2010, 4:55PM
“"I just dont trust the Labour Council anymore"
And you trust the Tory County Council?
Its budget is a lot worse...”
by Lee, Nottingham
Thursday, February 25 2010, 12:19PM
“Billy, The people of Nottingham could easily make Collins and his ilk redundant. Don't vote for them at the next council election.”
by Frustarted Beechdale Library user, Nottingham
Thursday, February 25 2010, 11:09AM
“Coun Jon Collins, leader of the city council, said: "We are looking to provide the same level of services but in a more cost-effective way.
Yet they are cutting services to save money.
Just look at the closure of some Libraries and some of the Day centers.
I just dont trust the Labour Council anymore”
by Mr. Sensible, The Real World
Thursday, February 25 2010, 10:49AM
“Not sure what to make of this; I wish the council wasn't going through with the frankly mad stadium idea, but, when it comes to the City and County budgets I think I prefer the City one.”
by Fred, Notts
Thursday, February 25 2010, 10:01AM
“I am a Council worker. Why did I have to find out about this from the Evening Post? Why didn't anybody warn us first?”
by billy, sherwood
Thursday, February 25 2010, 7:19AM
“Why cant the jobbing builder Collins be the first to be made redundant?Then perhaps Chapman but of course then his mate james mellors would give him as a barker maybe?”