“We can conclude from your usual drivel that you have not bothered to check any of the facts, just launched into personal attacks, it is about the norm i suppose.

Perhaps you can explain to us all why 42 of the countries leading environmental scientists entered into legal proceedings against the IPCC to remove manipulated submissions which gave a totally different conclusion, to their original scientifically proven conclusions.
Perhaps you would like to explain to us all why 20,000 + of the worlds leading environmental scientists have joined another group opposing the lies and misinformation portrayed by our, and many industrial nations Governments.

Perhaps you would care to explain to us why Government based their policies upon the scientific findings of 38 of these scientists findings over two decades or more.

Perhaps you would care to explain the findings of the recently leaked E-mails confirming what these scientists have already publicly stated.

Or is it you who lives in a fantasy world, of course it is; perhaps you need to learn that before you can resolve a problem you first need to identify exactly what it is.”

“
What we know for certain is that many of the countries leading scientists have been villified by the current Government for daring to provide evidence which contradicts the Governments message.

Amazing how "we" can "know something for certain" when it isn't true.

The Royal Society, the professional body representing the top scientists in this country has stated its considered conclusion that climate change is very probably being driven by human activity.

And before you make the usual erroneous argument about them doing so because they are only interested in getting more funding, take a look at some of their other recent pronouncements. Lord Rees, their president, was, for example, deeply critical of current Government policy on science funding. Clearly, not an organization that toadies to the administration in order to feather its nest.

Just because you desparately want something to be true to fit with your World view of an overbearing state conspiring against you does not make it so. Which is just as well, as I have no desire to end up living in your personal simplistic fantasy world. The real one is so much more interesting.”

“Yes, the climate is changing and most people accept this as the natural cycle of the earth, but it is the human influence which is refuted.

What we know for certain is that many of the countries leading scientists have been villified by the current Government for daring to provide evidence which contradicts the Governments message. How can this be, particularly when so much Government strategy was based upon their research, and they were held in such high esteem. Why do Government, through the IPCC, continue to drip feed misinformation and lies to an all too guillable public, then manipulate many of the scientific data on the site, often to a different conclusion.

Much of this can be checked, many of the contributors work for other organisations which publish the full submissions on their own websites, so a direct comparison can be made by anyone bothering to do so.

Why have those credible organisations submitting data contradicting the Government message suddenly had their funding cut, or scrapped all together, and those organisations promoting the message are suddenly in receipt of this funding.

With such overwhelming evidence, it is pretty conclusive what is happening, and the facts? buried under political interests.”

“Mel in the City a SUB AR U joking you don't see a lot as i discovered in Norway on a £5000 day out with the boys on board a Russian sub wearing my £300 GREY selag tracky whilst touring Europe in our £60000 fully paid for motorhome enjoying 18 countries with our STAFFY now back in our morgage free detached home enjoying being retired at 52 having worked for 38 years and not taking a shilling from the public purse what will you be doing when you are 52 still being a sad person calling people names have a nice life not. You really do need to get off the net and out in the real world”

“I'm not concerned one bit about so called climate change / global warming. The Earth has sorted itself out for billions of years and will continue to do so.

Don't get me wrong I don't like to see waste and will turn lights off when they are not needed etc but I enjoy my plasma TV and hoildays abroad and will continue to do so, after all whats a polar bear ever done for me?

Infact Polar bears are one of the few animals that will actually hunt man so the sooner we are shut of them the better!”

“Now here is an important question, is greener to light your wind or just let it flow freely into the atmosphere? If you light one, then it saves you putting the central heating on for three seconds, however if you let one go freely, then the methane attacks the atmosphere? Another way would be to have IP67 pants that seal in the gas and when they are full, you could empty the gas in a small portable cylinder and then run your car on the gas?”

“Surely planet Earth and every other living thing on it would benefit if humans did destroy themselves? Bring it on!”

“so anyway, back to the story, lots of hot air spoken, nothing has been done. at least gordon gave away one and half billion to countries far better off than us ,”

“The true home a scrattie can be anywhere really, however to qualify as one you ne one of the three things listed below, if you have all three, you are a king scratt.

A Subaru

A Staffie

A grey tracksuit”

“Lincoln, isn't that the home of the pikey?
A real scrattie place to live.”