Firefighters warn of dangers of parked cars after struggling to reach girls in house fire
FIREFIGHTERS who saved two young girls from a blazing house have urged people to think before they park.
The crew say they lost valuable seconds trying to navigate their way around parked cars in Osborne Grove, Sherwood when they attended a serious house fire in January.
Blue Watch manager Howie Pickersgill, of Arnold Fire Station, said: "We had a problem turning into the street from Victoria Road. The cars were parked too close to the junction so the fire engine couldn't swing into the street where the fire was."
Along with a crew from Stockhill Fire Station, Blue Watch saved two girls – one five years old and another 15 – after a tea light on top of a television caused a huge blaze in the living room. The ground floor of the property was gutted and the girls were trapped in a second floor room, hanging out of the window shouting for help.
Choose from 100's of Carpets, Vinyl & Laminate Floors. Get 50% Off any range. Just mention This is Nottingham when you call for your free measure and sample service.
Terms: Voucher can not be used with any other offer or promotion. Ends this Thursday. Do not miss out. This offer will not be repeated.
Contact: 0115 8969583
Valid until: Thursday, May 23 2013
Notts Fire and Rescue Service say bad parking is a problem for firefighters. In 2012 there were seven incidents of accidental damage caused by fire engines when crews were on their way to an emergency call.
Blue Watch say they would prefer it if cars on narrow streets parked half on the pavement in order for them to get through. Last year they had to force a car out of the way during a call-out to Raymead Drive, Bestwood. Mr Pickersgill said: "We'd had a call to say there was a fire and a man was trapped upstairs. We had to effectively drive through the car in order to get to it.
"On a terraced street, you've often got no choice but to park on both sides.
"At the end of the day we want people to think about access for us. If you have to look down the road and think 'can a car get down there?' then a fire engine definitely won't be able to."
At the end of last year the city council announced it would be using the power to hand £70 fines to people parked on pavements and grass verges.
Initially this was just in Woodside Road, Lenton Abbey, but, if successful, it is expected to be introduced across the city.
This directly competes with the crew's request to park half on and half off the pavement.
Mr Pickersgill said: "All we need is to get down a street. How the council deals with parking is not our problem."
Steve Hunt, head of service for traffic and safety at the city council, said: "We are always happy to look at specific issues in regard to parking with the fire service.
"Parking partially on the pavement can cause an obstruction to wheelchairs and buggies, sometimes forcing them into the road which is dangerous. Because of this we look at problems on a case by case basis. Where we have persistent issues we will look at actions to address problems.
"We advise people to park safely and legally and to be mindful of who might need to access the pavement and road."






18 Comments
View all
by irvine
Wednesday, March 13 2013, 3:05PM
“Shogun
Will you please refrain from calling everyone who proves you to be wrong as a "liar". It is extremely rude and very unpleasant. I'm sick of having to read it and getting pretty fed up with your quasi legal rubbish on every matter under the sun.
Thank you.”
by FormerlyW
Wednesday, March 13 2013, 2:44PM
“What are you wriggling about this time, smshogun? If you had bothered to read the reply from the police that I posted, you will see that it describes exactly the process that local authorities have to follow if they want to ban parking on the pavement, and that "If this is the case, then there will be signs which clearly point out on a particular road where parking on the pavement is specifically prohibited."
So, firstly, clearly they are willing to express a view on the process by which such orders work, and secondly their view flatly contradicts your repeated assertion that "the law clearly states that parking on a grass verge or pavement is illegal unless there is a sign specifically stating you can park on there."
Since anyone is likely to take a clear statement on an official police website over your unsupported assertion, even without taking into consideration your extensive track record of making fanciful claims about the legal process, I'd suggest you provide some evidence to back up your assertion and show that the police are wrong, by stating clearly what law you are referring to, or remain labelled a buffoonish fantasist who is under the bizarre misapprehension that he is demonstrating his intelligence by throwing around such random invented claims, even though they are so regularly shown to be entirely fabricated.”
by smshogun
Wednesday, March 13 2013, 2:22PM
“Now moving off tack again Formerly, this is not a Police matter as its a civil matter and the Police only work to guidelines in this area, not legislation; legislation which clearly states that its illegal to park on a footpath and is a civil offence, so the Police won't touch it. So we have easily disproved your alleged "official view" as particularly worthless as you could have simply looked up the legislation and found out parking on the pavement is illegal.
As I have previously stated, the law clearly states that parking on a grass verge or pavement is illegal unless there is a sign specifically stating you can park on there.
Soroya:
This is an interesting view, and one shared by many as all new pavements have to conform to the NRSWA which sets the minimum standards for pavement construction. Under the older legislation they had to be constructed to much lower standards which meant carrying pedestrians weight, or anything such as a wheelbarrow or push chair for example. Any vehicle parking on them simply damaged them.
Under the NRSWA pavements are being constructed to take the weight of a vehicle and parking on them wouldn't cause damage unless its a commercial vehicle, and although pavements are being upgraded as they are replaced, the majority are old and built to the old standards.
Many options have been up for discussion, one being a set of specific markings on new pavements which include a limit line which indicate that a car can park on them and how far they can encroach onto the pavement without obstructing it. This suggestion has gained considerable support as it covers all bases, it clearly indicates you can park on a specific pavement and the markings can be applied to all new pavements, or existing pavements constructed to NRSWA requirements.”
by digbypatch
Wednesday, March 13 2013, 7:30AM
“Parking on the pavement is not illegal unless the council have the authority like most boroughs in London have when you get a ticket for even one wheel on the kerb. Some areas have white lines painted along the pavement allowing the near side wheels on and it is also signed.
Around Nottingham the only way you get a ticket is if a person in a wheelchair or pushing a pram cannot get past and then it is causing an obstruction and then the Police can ticket or remove the car.
I would like to see cars that are parked within 10 metres of a junction to be ticketed or towed because I see that as more of a problem, by sometimes stopping large vehicles ie Fire Engine, Dustbin lorries from entering or exiting roads.”
by FormerlyW
Tuesday, March 12 2013, 11:06PM
“Yes, Soraya, that's just what the police had to say on the subject in the reference I provided. On the whole, I would rather take their official views on what may or may not be legal over smshogun who frequently pronounces on legal matters yet bizarrely almost never gets anything right.”
by soraya
Tuesday, March 12 2013, 8:37PM
“I think as long as folk leave at least 120cm between their car and the wall or post or whatever then that should be that.”
by soraya
Tuesday, March 12 2013, 8:34PM
“Formerly, are you living in the 1980s?
Parking was decriminalised in virtually every Authority decades ago. When was the last time you saw a Police traffic warden? well it was back then. It is now a corporate/civil matter for the Council.”
by FormerlyW
Tuesday, March 12 2013, 7:39PM
“"If you actually knew anything you would know (believe its 218) states you cannot park on a pavement or grass verge unless signage actually allows it." --- Smshogun
Well, here's my research smshogun. from the police, who know a lot more about what they are talking about than you do: https://http://tinyurl.com/cmwf72d . This clearly states that, unless causing an obstruction or there is a sign specifically forbidding it, parking on the pavement is not illegal.
Now, where is your evidence that contradicts this entirely, and states that parking on the pavement is illegal unless there is a sign *allowing* it?”
by FormerlyW
Tuesday, March 12 2013, 7:34PM
“So you are saying that you didn't proclaim that "This is something of a double edged sword as parking partially on the kerb is illegal" at 10:50AM? What a short memory you have, smshogun.”
by smshogun
Tuesday, March 12 2013, 7:27PM
“But once again if you actually did some research you would actually establish some facts instead of having to lie to try to win an argument, but what's new.
If you actually knew anything you would know (believe its 218) states you cannot park on a pavement or grass verge unless signage actually allows it.”