Drunk driver left 'housebound' by ban for being over the limit
A DISABLED pensioner claimed he would be left "housebound" once banned from driving after being found drunk at the wheel.
Neil Craig, 69, of Raglan Court, Beeston, is the third driver to be named and shamed in the Post's Christmas anti-drink driving campaign, None for the Road.
-

Banned: Neil Craig outside Nottingham Magistrates' Court.
Craig was disqualified from driving for 12 months and fined £100 at Nottingham Magistrates' Court earlier this week.
He admitted drink-driving in his Volvo in Marlborough Road, Beeston, on Tuesday, December 6.
Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk
View detailsOur heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.
Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk
Contact: 01858 468192
Valid until: Sunday, May 26 2013
A breath test revealed 45 microgrammes of alcohol in 100 millilitres of breath. The legal limit is 35 microgrammes.
A driver for 50 years, Craig told sentencing Judge Morris Cooper his thoughts on the ban: "It's not just a year. It's my life down the pan."
The judge, who told him he also had to pay prosecution costs and a victim surcharge, said if he drives in public, for example in a car park or on a road, he would be driving while disqualified.
Craig responded: "Sir, this has put me housebound now."
Police stopped Craig's Volvo S40 in Beeston High Road, after receiving information that the driver of the vehicle was a possible drink-driver.
Officers said he smelt of alcohol, failed a road-side breath test and was subsequently arrested and cautioned.
The court heard in mitigation that his appearance in front of the judge was devastating day for him. Craig is 69 and about to turn 70, which will require him to reapply for his driving licence.
He lives in warden-aided accommodation in Beeston, is disabled and suffers from shortness of breath.
The court was told that Craig needed his car to get about and he usually drives 1,500 miles a month.
The court heard there was no indication that he had been driving badly at the time of the offence and he was fully co-operative at the police station.
Judge Cooper said it was not the first time Craig had been before the court for drink driving but that the previous instance was a long time ago.
Names of shame
TWO other people have appeared before magistrates in Nottingham charged with drink-driving this month.
Janice Noble, 53, of Sheriffs Lea, Beeston, was banned from the roads for 18 months and fined £100 for drink-driving in Ranson Road, Chilwell, on December 7.
She was in a red Land Rover when she was stopped and found to have 70 microgrammes of alcohol in 100 millilitres of breath – double the legal limit.
She admitted this offence and a separate charge of theft from Lidl, in Chilwell, of a bottle of wine. She did not receive a separate penalty for the theft.
For the drink-driving she has to pay a total of £100.
In another courtroom, Steven Phillips, of Lorimer Avenue, Gedling, admitted drink-driving in a Ford Focus in Mansfield Road, Nottingham, on December 5.
He had drunk 111 microgrammes of alcohol in 100 millilitres of breath.
The 24-year-old had been driving erratically when he was stopped, clipped a kerb and drove across the road, the court heard.
His case was adjourned for a pre-sentence report to be prepared.




Comments
by MarkXBSSensor
Saturday, January 21 2012, 3:43PM
“Well, isn't that amazing!
A week's gone by and I haven't been back even once to entirely demolish either of FW or Starving's spurious "arguments".
Never mind both.
Repeatedly.
Funny that!”
by davies72
Monday, January 16 2012, 8:22PM
“nice coat you volvo driving alcoholic”
by spondon
Monday, January 16 2012, 3:12PM
“I am in danger of being bored to death with the subject and tedious nit picking.
Let us all give it a rest and await the next rant from our own expert Mr Mann”
by smshogun
Monday, January 16 2012, 12:48PM
“Before the invention of transport more were killed by pestulence and plagues, and of course the odd epidemic.”
by starving
Monday, January 16 2012, 11:28AM
“I agree . . . Therein lies Madness . . .”
by Conversation
Monday, January 16 2012, 9:37AM
“Gentlemen, enough, grow up.”
by starving
Monday, January 16 2012, 9:19AM
“Dear MarkSensless
I know I am wasting my breath but I believe my mocking posts mentioned: BEFORE the invention of the "wheel"! This was what you implied in one of your many diatribes.
"WHEEL" AS IN WHEELED TRANSPORT . . . So, no carts or carriages.
Possibly a few on foot were killed or injured over the years prior to the invention of the wheel. Outside of warfare that is.
I saw an estimate a few years ago that said by the turn of the Century ie: 2000AD 50 million people would have been killed in what could be termed road traffic accidents.
Galloping horses would have to have been pretty active over the millennia to achieve even a fraction of that number . . .”
by FormerlyW
Monday, January 16 2012, 12:21AM
“"You, the Post, the early morning dragnetters, and their other supporters, claim as their justification:
"If It Saves Just One Life!""
Oh look, you said it again, Mr Mann. Remarkable if so tangential and irrelevant to your argument that you would spam the same thing on so many threads.
Even more remarkable given that no-one here has based any argument by stating "If It Saves One Life."
It's almost as if you just made it up to shoot it down. What was that called again? Oh yes, a straw man argument. Your forte, it would seem.”
by MarkXBSSensor
Sunday, January 15 2012, 10:37PM
“By the way, starving, if you had any real interest in road safety you would already be familiar with things like:
http://tinyurl.com/l3gcn4
Or:
http://tinyurl.com/7jzxxox
Or even:
http://tinyurl.com/7zmnajy
If you do follow the links, and even read them, what's the betting you completely misread the dates and even fail to see the actual references to the vehicles.
There are none so blind as those who will not see!”
by MarkXBSSensor
Sunday, January 15 2012, 2:37AM
“By the way, this is what your demonisation of drink, and "drunk" drivers, leads to:
http://tinyurl.com/7e3s8ua
You, the Post, the early morning dragnetters, and their other supporters, claim as their justification:
"If It Saves Just One Life!"
Whereas the real effect of your policies is the police "protecting" the public like that!
Read it and weep!
(And some of the comments from epileptics, other stroke victims, etc).”