City must get on the front foot, says council leader
NOTTINGHAM'S political leader has called on the city to get on the "front foot" over the economic momentum created by massive investment in its infrastructure.
Jon Collins spoke out after the city wooed potential investors at MIPIM, the international property and development exhibition in France.
-
Jon Collins
Team Nottingham, the private-sector-led partnership which leads Nottingham's presence at the Cannes event, was able to point to nearly £800 million worth of live investment in projects like the tram, the A453 widening and the transport interchange at the railway station.
Speaking to Business Post, city council leader Mr Collins urged businesses based here and involved in developing the city to make the most of investments which gave the city a "unique" opportunity to open up key development sites, such as the Nottingham Enterprise Zone.
visit us at www.meetthelenders.co.uk/blogs to Save 30% off your loan fees with Quick Quid, Read our article for instructions
Contact: 0115 8962299
Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013
He said: "For a long period, we have looked at ourselves and we have looked at challenges we have got to address rather than the advantages that we can shout about.
"I'm not saying everything is rosy but we really have tackled the challenges that perhaps a decade ago we had a reputation for. Rather than apologising for those issues, we should now be on the front foot about all these investments.
"This can make a difference with potential investors because people can see that things are actually happening now in Nottingham. Because of that infrastructure work, you have got people in work and when you get people working, you get a market."
He added: "Compared to other cities, we are actually doing pretty well in terms of employment and we've got levels of investment in ways that other cities haven't – it gives that sense of momentum to the city and people can actually physically see the investments taking place on projects which are going to improve their ability to do business.
"The reason we have got all these investments is that we've worked hard at it – not just the city, but people involved in developing the city – over a long period of time.
"We have got investment, we have got political stability in the city, and we have been able to develop a strategy for the medium term in ways that other cities have not been able to. Other cities have chopped and changed; Nottingham hasn't."
Mr Collins – who had cycled from London to Cannes to raise money for a leukaemia charity – attended a number of Team Nottingham events and joined other council leaders for a presentation about HS2.
The city council pulled out of a direct presence at MIPIM three years ago, citing financial pressures. Since then, a group of city businesses has officially represented the city under the Team Nottingham banner, paying for the presence of key inward investment, planning and regeneration officials from the council.
Most of England's major cities have continued to fund a heavyweight presence at MIPIM, with Manchester and Birmingham spending heavily on a high profile.
Mr Collins was non-committal on whether Nottingham City Council would lead the city's presence at MIPIM again but said: "I think it's an event that has got a lot of potential for us. It's important that we're seen here, that we make a lot of contacts, talk to developers and tell them what Nottingham has got to offer and sell our city in the same way that others do.
"You have got cities here from across the EU, all of whom are trying to attract inward investment. I know in the past people have pointed a finger and wondered whether it was worth it. What I would say is that the money we spend is limited and that if we weren't here, we would be missing this opportunity."
He added: "We have to make decisions about what is the appropriate level to be operating at. We have to look at it each year and see whether or not we stick with what we have got or change it. We would need to be convinced it was money well spent.
"It's as much about having the right people making the right contacts as it is about a stand. There are some cities with a huge physical presence which must have cost them a large amount of money and I'm not sure that is necessary. The most important thing is that Invest in Nottingham is here and talking to the right people."
This year, Nottingham had a shared presence in the official MIPIM exhibition centre with Derby, a stand part-funded by the Local Enterprise Partnership for the two cities and counties, D2N2.
Mr Collins says he backs the LEP but believes it might be more effective if it also took in Leicester and Leicestershire, which currently has its own separate LEP.
"I think the LEP is important to us," he said."My personal view is that it's a question of whether or not we want it to remain a body representing two cities and counties or extend it to include Leicester."
Nottingham announced two deals at MIPIM this year, one of them a land deal which should progress £30m plans for the development of 200 rented properties at the Old Sandfield school site, in Lenton, by UK Regeneration.
Mr Collins said: "It is interesting to see the concentration of people and developers here at MIPIM. It was at MIPIM a couple of years ago that we had our first conversations with UK Regeneration and we have now been able to make the announcement about Sandfield. It's important to recognise that you don't get results instantly here."
10 Comments
by ToryMan
Wednesday, March 20 2013, 8:39AM
“There is no point in trying to reason with people like Harrison Stotle or Brorabrora. People like this constantly undermine opposition to the council by putting up comments that are easily knocked back. They make opposition to the council look ill informed and thereby let the council off the hook time and time again.”
by Neo_MadBadger
Wednesday, March 20 2013, 7:09AM
“Brorabrora, why have you not responded to my question? If you can provide the name of the company for whom you worked, we can all check to see if it has relocated to Sheffield and thus your and other's points about the effects of the WPL will be proven to an extent. If you do not readers might believe that you made up what you wrote.
Of course, the other points your post raise are these. Depending on what line of business your former employer was in, is it really going to save money relocating away from its customer base in the Nottingham area? Did your former employer not give what I assume it thought was its highly-valued wrokforce (of which you were a member) the option of relocating with the business to Sheffield? A good employer that values it workforce would do so as it also saves costs in recruiting new staff, training, etc. If your employer did not offer relocation to staff, perhaps yo're better off without working for it? If it did offer you reloaction, why did you not take the offer rather than be made redundant?”
by Neo_MadBadger
Tuesday, March 19 2013, 5:35PM
“It's interesting isn't it. Harrystotle can no longer crtiicise the city council for what many times here he has claimed is its wasteful expenditure on Cannes because as this story shows it is being paid for by the private sector. Now that being the case, does Harrystotle still think that the Cannes trip is a waste of time as regards attracting investment into Nottingham or not?
He probably will not reply as he's already defaulted to his other mode, that of bleating untruths about the city council's rating.”
by Neo_MadBadger
Tuesday, March 19 2013, 5:31PM
“Brorabrora, what is the name of the company you mention?”
by EggyEggCup
Tuesday, March 19 2013, 3:38PM
“If I was millionare businessman who just by some quirk of chance happened to be in the south of France looking to invest in a new location in the English Midlands, I would hardly be impressed if an unshaven person in cycling shorts came up to me and promised to charge me several hundred pounds per year for each parking place I needed for my employees. I'd be even less impressed if he mentioned that I would be paying for his oversized train set with 2 lines that went nowhere near where I was thinking of putting the business and nowhere near where my employees lived.”
by FormerlyW
Tuesday, March 19 2013, 1:40PM
“"his council has always been two star rated." -- harrystotle
Presumably, that would be yet another reference to the Audit Commission rating of local authorities.
It has been explained to you often enough that Nottingham is not "two star rated", because that particular classification scheme from the Comprehensive Performance Assessment disappeared in 2008. It was subsequently replaced by the Comprehensive Area Assessment, which replaced star rating with a system of green (exceptional performance) and red (significant concern) flags and an over-all score. In this latest assessment, no red flag areas were identified, and they were awarded one green flag for their use of public transport. The score given was 3 out of 4, described textually as "performs well." And, unlike harrystotle, I won't just assert this: here's the score awarded by the Audit Commission: http://tinyurl.com/d3688sk
Comparing this score and the distribution of red and green flags to the marks given to other local authorities places Nottingham somewhere well in the top half of all authorities for performance, not "in the bottom 20%."
But then you already knew all that, didn't you, harrystotle? It's almost as if you weren't interested in letting little matters like facts stand in the way of your irrational hatred for the City Council.
It's a shame, because, as with an local authority, there is plenty to criticize about how ours is run, but any rational constructive discussion gets lumped in with easily-falsifiable nonsense like yours, ironically contributing to maintaining the status quo.”
by brorabrora
Tuesday, March 19 2013, 1:39PM
“As someone who is out of work as a direct result of the parking levy, (my former employer moved to Sheffield because of it), I think John Collins speaks a load of Rubbish.”
by FormerlyW
Tuesday, March 19 2013, 1:38PM
“"his council has always been two star rated." -- harrystotle
Presumably, that would be yet another reference to the Audit Commission rating of local authorities.
It has been explained to you often enough that Nottingham is not "two star rated", because that particular classification scheme from the Comprehensive Performance Assessment disappeared in 2008. It was subsequently replaced by the Comprehensive Area Assessment, which replaced star rating with a system of green (exceptional performance) and red (significant concern) flags and an over-all score. In this latest assessment, no red flag areas were identified, and they were awarded one green flag for their use of public transport. The score given was 3 out of 4, described textually as "performs well." And, unlike harrystotle, I won't just assert this: here's the score awarded by the Audit Commission: http://tinyurl.com/d3688sk
Comparing this score and the distribution of red and green flags to the marks given to other local authorities places Nottingham somewhere well in the top half of all authorities for performance, not "in the bottom 20%."
But then you already knew all that, didn't you, harrystotle? It's almost as if you weren't interested in letting little matters like facts stand in the way of your irrational hatred for the City Council.
It's a shame, because, as with an local authority, there is plenty to criticize about how ours is run, but any rational constructive discussion gets lumped in with easily-falsifiable nonsense like yours, ironically contributing to maintaining the status quo.”
by Weir007
Tuesday, March 19 2013, 10:53AM
“Well I'm more knowledgable after reading that article.”
by harrystotle1
Tuesday, March 19 2013, 10:52AM
“I'd like to know how Jon Collins thinks the Work Place Parking Levy will attract businesses into the city.
"Other cities have chopped and changed; Nottingham hasn't." - Jon Collins is right there though - his council has always been two star rated.”