Campaigners make a noise over baths closure

Trusted article source icon
Saturday, February 06, 2010
Profile image for This is Nottingham

This is Nottingham

More than 100 campaigners seeking to keep the Victoria Leisure Centre open marched through Nottingham today. [Saturday].

The Save the Victoria Baths Campaign organised the demonstration over the Sneinton facility.

Supporters object to Nottingham City Council's plans to redevelop the existing leisure centre by building a new, smaller swimming pool.

They are also concerned at the council's decision to bring the demolition of the leisure centre forward by one year, so the existing facility will close at the end of March, even though planning permission has not yet been approved.

Today, a noisy protest made its way from Old Market Square to the Victoria Leisure Centre in Sneinton. Some of the demonstrators were wearing swimming hats and goggles.

Brendan O'Mara, 32, from Sneinton, said: "They want to move forward closing the swimming pool and that is in contravention of stated plans. It was done without consultation.

"The swimming baths are fine as they are, they just need refurbishment. The new facilities would be smaller and would not have the Turkish bath facilities."

Many of those on the march objected to the redevelopment of the existing facility, but also said they are concerned the city council will not deliver the new building.

Stephen James, 51, from Mapperley, said: "The council has not got planning permission. They have given an undertaking but it is not worth the paper it is written on."

But the city council has strongly rejected the claim.

In an article for the Evening Post last week, the city council's portfolio holder for culture Coun David Trimble said: " I can confirm that we will keep the existing facility open until April 1; have money in the budget to build a new facility; have committed to build a new facility in line with the choice made by the majority of local residents and expect the new facility to open in 2012."

Initially, a consultation on the future of the building, undertaken by the city council, produced a majority in favour of refurbishing the existing building. Subsequently, the council went into local schools and made presentations to the children. When their views were counted the results were reversed and there was a majority in favour of the rebuild.

21
Tweet this article
Report

21 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Nottingham

    by Nick, Wiltshire

    Sunday, February 07 2010, 7:32PM

    “I no longer live in the Sneinton area, but having worked close to The VLC for over fifteen years, I have been following the current debate with interest.

    By assuming the title of Mr Sensible, The Real World, your correspondent is asking us to take on trust this self -accreditation. Holding such an opinion is important only in the respect of how it affects the way he treats those who do not share his point of view.

    What is more important is that Mr Sensible is asking us to take on trust the conduct of The City Council as well. This will not do.

    The Council has been less than transparent in its dealings with the people of Sneinton. Admittedly this is my opinion but one commonly held; yet it is challengeable by a council prepared to lay out all the facts in public. For reasons best know to itself the Council refuses to do so. Perhaps matters have gone beyond this stage and there is need for a more legalistic approach, where interested parties including Councillor Trimble answer probing questions under oath rather than offering opinions from polemical news columns.”

  • Profile image for This is Nottingham

    by Someone, Somewhere

    Sunday, February 07 2010, 2:08PM

    “Scratties, blah blah blah, whatever. *Yawn*

    Please.

    Change the record. You're boring.”

  • Profile image for This is Nottingham

    by billy, Living in this Labour generated hell hole.

    Sunday, February 07 2010, 1:37PM

    “Does anybody know if you can catch AIDS from a toilet seat?”

  • Profile image for This is Nottingham

    by MadBadger, The Sett

    Sunday, February 07 2010, 1:29PM

    “Billy, outside toilets are not a good idea.

    I think you'll find that the chimney sweep will give you cholera.”

  • Profile image for This is Nottingham

    by billy, Living in this Labour generated hell hole.

    Sunday, February 07 2010, 1:23PM

    “I think most of sneinton do now have baths, which is a shame.

    The purpose of building houses without washing facilities was a way for the superior classes to keep such sc um under our control, back in the days when we were able to beat them for not cleaning our chimley properly was a golden era, and I for one think it should be re-introduced.

    We should start by building more back to back houses with outside cra ppers (shared by ten families) for the lower classes, that is why I am in favour of keeping sneniton baths in working order for when these days return, which I think will be when Cameron gets in. I know its harsh but scratties are like Iraqis they need controlling.”

  • Profile image for This is Nottingham

    by Tom, Sneinton

    Sunday, February 07 2010, 10:54AM

    “In response to Peter- it is easy to see why the Centre has not been as well attended as it could have been: the facility has suffered from being inadequately maintained and very poorly promoted, resulting in a shoddy appearance and little local knowledge about the facilities that are on offer.

    Despite this neglect the centre remains enormously popular and well used, and the robust old buildings remain in good condition. The Council's own figures (from 2004) identified just £0.75m of repairs to bring the centre up to 'good' condition- this work was not carried out. Their 2008 figures show that complete refurbishment, including the 2004 work AND:
    - replacing or overhauling the whole roof
    - completely refurbishing the Turkish Baths
    - complete replacement of all the changing rooms
    - replacing the pool surrounds, linings and drainage
    would cost around £2m.

    If more money is available, all properly conducted consultations of local people have shown that they would strongly prefer this money to be spent on improving the existing buildings rather than knocking them down and building a new centre.

    And the idea that properly maintained old buildings need repair more quickly than new buildings is simply untrue- a quick look at the refurbishment schedule for the recent pools around Nottingham will show just how quickly they have declined and needed major overhaul- I am sure that none of them could have survived the 20 years of neglect that the Victoria Baths have endured, or engendered the same sense of pride and ownership from the local community.

    It's good that you trust the Council to carry out their promises and will judge them on their performance at the next election. The demand to keep the Baths open until planning permission has been obtained is, in any case, a very reasonable thing they can do to demonstrate their good intentions.”

  • Profile image for This is Nottingham

    by Ruth, St Anns

    Sunday, February 07 2010, 10:49AM

    “"consultation on the future of the building undertaken by NCC,produced a MAJORITY in favour of refurbishing existing building...NCC went in2 local schools & made presentaion 2 children...results REVERSED . Enough said.”

  • Profile image for This is Nottingham

    by Mr. Sensible, The Real World

    Sunday, February 07 2010, 8:24AM

    “"I see someone using multiple ID's to try and make his views look popular."

    I think we've heard that one before.

    I could just as easily say that about you.

    Don't do it.”

  • Profile image for This is Nottingham

    by guy the gorilla, nottingham

    Sunday, February 07 2010, 8:20AM

    “our councillors are obsessed with their legoland buildings. They are also obsessted with destroying architectural heritage whenever they have an opportunity. At any cost. They do like to spend your money.These self serving people will have their own way. Do not doubt that . However, the next time they ask for your vote, tell them to **** *** and make sure they understand the meaning of the words.”

  • Profile image for This is Nottingham

    by Peter, Nottingham

    Saturday, February 06 2010, 11:02PM

    “Perhaps those who think the existing leisure centre should be revamped can explain why useage of the pool has been declining for years.

    And although a revamp may be cheaper in the first instance, I suspect that the centre would be more expensive to run and would require expensive refurbishment long before a completely re-built centre would. In the longer run, a rebuilt, modern centre will be used by more people as well as save money.

    Also, anyone who knows anything about swimming will tell you that a modern 25m pool is much better to train in than the old style pool.

    I trust that the council will do as they promise and start building the new centre asap and if they haven't started before the next City Council elections, local people will be able to punish them won't they.....”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters