Bishop 'very disappointed' by women bishop defeat
CHURCH leaders in Notts say they are disappointed at the Church of England's vote against women bishops.
The measure fell at the final hurdle by just six votes in the General Synod on Tuesday.
-
Right Reverend Paul Butler
Supporters vowed to continue their campaign but it could be five years before another vote is held.
The Bishop of Southwell and Nottingham, the Right Reverend Paul Butler, wrote to all his clergy and ministers to say: "I am personally very disappointed. Many will also be angry and bewildered and everyone will need time to take stock and reflect on what we do next."
API Pond Care Food BUY ONE GET ONE FREE!!!
*selected foods only- see in store.
Terms:
1. Voucher is not exchangeable for cash and is non-refundable.
2. Voucher can only be used once, per customer, per transaction.
3. Cannot be used in conjunction with any other offers or promotions.
Contact: 01246 386616
Valid until: Tuesday, May 28 2013
The Bishop will be setting up an open meeting, open to anyone, in the next few weeks to look at future options.
He added: "This was the letter I honestly did not want to have to send, after yesterday's vote. But we are all called to continue to live out our calling to join together in the transforming mission of God.
"Many will feel Synod's decision has hindered that work, but it emphatically has not stopped it. God will keep working, and so must we."
Liz Murray, assistant curate for the Eastwood and Brinsley with Underwood parish, which has two churches, also spoke out against the decision.
"I am surprised and disappointed," she said. "I really thought it would go through.
"This is a major blow to the Church, but I think we can survive it.
"And I think for the wider Anglican community it seems a little embarrassing, because New Zealand, states in Africa, Australia and America all have women priests already.
"But my hopes are high this will be revisited soon."
The draft measure was carried in the three houses of the General Synod but failed to gain the necessary two thirds majority among lay members.
The House of Bishops voted 44 in favour, with three against and two recorded abstentions. In the House of Clergy, 148 voted in favour, 45 against and there were no abstentions.
But in the House of Laity, 74 voted against, compared to 132 in favour with no abstentions.
Supporters of women bishops were "devastated" and betrayed.
Sally Barnes, of campaign group Women and the Church (Watch), said she and her colleagues were "very angry".
She said: "My initial reaction is one of deep sorrow at the missed opportunity, especially as we know that the House of Bishops really wanted it to go through.
"We have always said that the way of voting people into the Synod needs a wider electorate to get a wider representation of views because they've gone against the stated view of the wider Church."
Comments
by SteveBasford
Friday, November 23 2012, 11:37PM
“democracy in action....”
by kilowatt2
Friday, November 23 2012, 9:10PM
“I think more people in the UK care more about who's going to get voted off X Factor at the weekend!”
by Tessy
Friday, November 23 2012, 2:57PM
“No, you said 'who cares' all i'm saying is just because you don't deem something important, doesn't mean that others don't. Clearly some people do care.”
by Son_of_Reddog
Friday, November 23 2012, 2:04PM
“Obviously news isn't there to entertain me, I never suggested it was, but I find all this made-up religious nonsense so tedious it's untrue.
If a god exists, and if he/she/it is as petty, spiteful and dogmatic as organised religions are, I'd rather go to hell.”
by Tessy
Friday, November 23 2012, 1:30PM
“Clearly not for everyone, the news isn't there just to personally entertain you, you know.”
by kilowatt2
Thursday, November 22 2012, 9:37PM
“Got to agree with Son_of_Reddog - bit of an irrelevance the church now isn't it.”
by Son_of_Reddog
Thursday, November 22 2012, 4:14PM
“Who cares!”
by JoeP1
Thursday, November 22 2012, 2:55PM
“As an atheist I should be laughing out loud, but I feel for these women, who are not able to rise to the top of their profession.
It is very worrying that there is a group of people who believe that because a man a couple of thousand years ago set up his own religion using only other males as his officers, then it must mean that only men must officiate forever.
I admit, even my dear old mum didn't regard me as a genius, but even I know that all that time ago men had the whip hand, and even within my life time, till a short time ago, women got very short shrift in this country.
When we were first married, my wife had to get me to sign a form allowing her to open a bank account, she had to show evidence that she was married or going to be married, before she could get contraceptive advice, and there are lots more instances of discrimination against women.
Thankfully most have gone, however, I think at least one of the women priests needs to take the bull by the horns and challenge this ruling in court, and claim sex discrimination; she'd win hands-down and knock this nonsense on the head once and for all.”